The version yourCFO will read.
Cost, return, sensitivity and risk, written in the language your finance function already uses — not agency language translated after the fact.
Numbers with theassumptions on show.
The costed argument that gets the work funded.
Investment cases fail when the assumptions are buried. Ours put them on the first page: what we believe, why, and what happens to the return if we are wrong by thirty per cent.
The output is a document that survives finance review — with a sensitivity model, a phased spend profile, and the honest downside case included rather than omitted.
What youget.
Every item is a deliverable you receive, not an activity we perform.
- Cost model across build and run
- Return modelled on your own unit economics
- Sensitivity analysis on the key assumptions
- Phased spend profile aligned to delivery
- Risk register with mitigations
- Board and investment committee summary
Where this workhas landed.
Before youget in touch.
They accept the model, not the numbers — we build it with your finance team so the assumptions are theirs and the arithmetic is auditable.
Yes, though it is much stronger following a diagnostic sprint. Without the diagnosis the inputs are estimates rather than findings.
Make the caseproperly.
A short call is enough to tell whether this is the right piece of work for you. If it is not, we will say so.